|
All victims of crime deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. However, certain myths and misperceptions about victimization can lead officers to misperceive victim behaviors and doubt their credibility even when they are telling the truth. Many of these misperceptions arise from a lack of understanding about how traumatic events psychologically, behaviorally, and physiologically affect individuals, i.e., how victims act before, during, and following a crime and when they are interviewed. Learning to recognize and address assumptions and stereotypes is crucial in transforming “respect for victims” from a concept to practices that improve evidence collection and procedural justice, and safety for the victim. The sections below provide examples of agencies in three stages of development: Lagging Behind, when an agency does not have a formal policy or the practices are outdated and/or harmful; Making Progress, when an agency uses practices that are considered the minimum standard; and Leading the Way, when an agency has researched promising practices and implements best practices tailored to the needs of victims. The examples provided below are not exhaustive for each category; they are only meant to illustrate the types of practices common at each stage.
![]()
![]()
Explore the resources below for guidance on how to move beyond “Lagging Behind” and “Making Progress” to “Leading the Way.” The resources will help to understand how trauma affects memory and the way in which a victim both gives their account and behaves before, during, or following an assault:
This project was supported by Grant No. 15JOVW-22-GK-04008-MUMU, awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed on this page are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Justice. |